One thing to consider: Bond is more witty and a planner than Bourne. It's kind of the old Batman vs. Superman deal, where obviously Superman would win if you simply put the 2 in a cage match, however Batman, like bond, is the superior strategist, and would never allow himself to be in the position of hand-to-hand combat with a power like superman. So Bond would know the abilities of his foe- Bourne, and unless forced, would avoid a closed-in situation of hand-to-hand or gun-to-gun combat. If you released the two in seperate parts of the world with orders to kill the other, Bond would emerge victorious as the superior strategist. As to the result of Batman vs. Superman under the same circumstances: This page was your idea and I won't steal the battle between your 2 all-time favorite characters.
HellsColdDay
· 1 year ago
Bond and Bourne are both extremely fast thinkers and plan in the moment. I wouldn't say one is better than the other that way. As far as planning in to the future, the IMF is the best at that. However, that is more Mr. Phelps than Mr. Hunt.
And I never liked that Superman/Batman debate. Batman would need a lot more than time to plan to beat Superman. He would need time to plan, the element of surprise, homecourt advantage, (I'll write posts on each of these) and a warehouse of kryptonite.
Daniel Montgomery
· 1 year ago
I'd just add that batman would have a reasonable chance of killing Superman with a few good Kryptonite weapons, and playing on Supermans real weakness: his protection of humanity. I think Batman, as clever as he is, could set a trap for Superman by setting up a group of people in supposed peril, and lure him into a Kryptonite heavy zone. I'm tempted to finish the story but again I'll leave it to you.
HellsColdDay
· 1 year ago
I just wrote an "Element of Surprise" post that talks a little about a Superman/Batman fight.
If Batman trys to exploit Superman's soft spot for humanity, that goes against Batman's character. He is just as commited to not killing as Superman. However, I do get your point. In a comic book battle Batman's "Hush" storyline, Batman snaps Superman out of Poison Ivey's control by having Catman throw Lois off a building. If for some reason Superman didn't come to her aid, Catwoman was still in position to save her herself. Of course, Superman did come to her aid.
Wilson
· 1 year ago
Are you kidding? Firstly, Bond would have definatly won the Shoot out because of his amazing sense of anyone anywhere, he would have known where Bourne and Hunt is. Lets not forget that James Bond has also faced some super human foes like Jaws. I believe the other two rounds are unarguably right. Bond has amazing skills with a car and Bourne is awsome at fist fighting.
Mark 62
· 1 year ago
Guys! You can't bring the historical bond movies b4 casino royle here! From all the bond movies last 2 bond movies have shown bonds real skills(because invisible car don't exists!) now bettle between three ultimate spys bourn desarves to be the number 1.(because he is the scary verson!):-)
SON
· 10 months ago
Bourne is number one, he can perfetcly act under pressure
Earlofthercs
· 10 months ago
Why can't we bring in historical Bond movies? Where does it say that in the set up?
Anyways, while I agree with everything until round 3... and even then while I agree that bourne would out quick draw bond, I dont think he'd do it quick enough to stop Bond getting his shot off (he'd have to outdraw fast enough for his bullet to hit bond before bond fires, while that would depend upon how far away they are from one another, in the senario above, I don't see it happening) in which case Bond would get shot first... but Bourne'd still be shot too! Given that he'd likely take longer to die too, I guess you'd still call it a win for Bourne, but really the true winner would be organised crime and enemy spy agencies, who'd have a field day ocne their 3 greatest opponants have killed each other!
JULIOG626
· 9 months ago
I Just thought i would school all of you real quick. My man Flint would take them all out with one judo chop. Lol.
Earlofthercs
· 9 months ago
Nicely played, juliog626. You win one internets.
danny martin :P
· 6 months ago
bourne will win but u no what will be more of a match to bourne? NEO!
All Comments
And I never liked that Superman/Batman debate. Batman would need a lot more than time to plan to beat Superman. He would need time to plan, the element of surprise, homecourt advantage, (I'll write posts on each of these) and a warehouse of kryptonite.
If Batman trys to exploit Superman's soft spot for humanity, that goes against Batman's character. He is just as commited to not killing as Superman. However, I do get your point. In a comic book battle Batman's "Hush" storyline, Batman snaps Superman out of Poison Ivey's control by having Catman throw Lois off a building. If for some reason Superman didn't come to her aid, Catwoman was still in position to save her herself. Of course, Superman did come to her aid.
Anyways, while I agree with everything until round 3... and even then while I agree that bourne would out quick draw bond, I dont think he'd do it quick enough to stop Bond getting his shot off (he'd have to outdraw fast enough for his bullet to hit bond before bond fires, while that would depend upon how far away they are from one another, in the senario above, I don't see it happening) in which case Bond would get shot first... but Bourne'd still be shot too! Given that he'd likely take longer to die too, I guess you'd still call it a win for Bourne, but really the true winner would be organised crime and enemy spy agencies, who'd have a field day ocne their 3 greatest opponants have killed each other!